• Industry
    • Opinion
    • Features
      • iGaming Data
      • Sports Betting Data
    • Finance
    • Online Casinos
    • Podcast

      News

      Casino Ballot Measures Find Mixed Results In Virginia, Arkansas, And Missouri

      Only Virginia’s casino initiative in Petersburg survived the polls

      By Erik Gibbs

      Last updated: November 6, 2024

      3 min

      ballot drop

      Within the gaming industry, casino legislation was a prominent topic at the polls across the U.S. on Tuesday, with voters in three states weighing in on ballot measures regarding brick-and-mortar expansion.

      From a promising economic boost in Petersburg, Virginia, to the revocation of a contentious casino license in Arkansas and a decisive rejection of a proposed property near Missouri’s Lake of the Ozarks, these votes reflect a wide range of public sentiment toward casino development across the country.

      Petersburg casino moves forward

      Voters in Petersburg gave a strong mandate to a proposed casino, with the ballot measure passing by a substantial margin. With 71% of votes counted, 82% of residents had favored the project, green-lighting construction on what is anticipated to become a substantial revenue generator for the region.

      The $1.4 billion casino project, led by The Cordish Companies, is set to encompass a 400,000-square-foot facility. Plans include a 200-room hotel, multiple dining and entertainment options, and a state-of-the-art gaming venue.

      City officials and The Cordish Companies estimate that this project will bring approximately $2.8 billion in economic benefits to Petersburg over the next decade. Local government anticipates $240 million in tax revenue, which would be a major financial lift for the city as it continues to rebound from a near-bankruptcy situation nine years ago, when it faced a $17 million deficit.

      Petersburg Mayor Sam Parham described the vote as a clear indication of the city’s enthusiasm for the development. He emphasized the immediate next steps of finalizing zoning approvals, with plans to break ground in early 2025.

      The casino’s opening is slated for 2026. Petersburg’s win on the casino measure follows the city of Richmond’s rejection of similar proposals on two prior occasions, positioning Petersburg to claim the license instead.

      Arkansas voters say no, limit gaming commission’s powers

      In Arkansas, Issue 2 became the only citizen-led initiative to make it to the 2024 ballot, resulting in a shift in the way casino licenses are issued in the state. With 96% of votes counted, Issue 2 passed with 55.8% approval, amending the state constitution to require countywide votes for new casino licenses and stripping the Arkansas Racing Commission (ARC) of its authority to issue licenses in Pope County.

      The amendment, which will revoke a casino license that the ARC issued to Cherokee Nation Businesses in June, marks a major turning point for the gaming landscape in Arkansas. The measure was largely funded by the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, a neighboring tribe with vested interests in curbing potential competition near its casino on the Arkansas-Oklahoma state line.

      Here is the current standing of Issue 2 voting, according to AP News.
      The pass of the issue means the casino will not be built in Pope County. The group ‘Local Voters in Charge’ that was supporting the passage says communities need to have the final vote. However, Chuck Garrett,… https://t.co/KAj21bBRvg pic.twitter.com/h3vI5z5b2o

      — Tylisa Hampton (@TylisaHamptontv) November 6, 2024

      The vote was not without controversy. The Cherokee Nation had mounted a legal challenge to Issue 2, questioning the wording of the amendment and the signature-gathering process behind the initiative.

      Despite these efforts, just weeks before Election Day the state Supreme Court allowed the measure to remain on the ballot. Now, any new casino proposals will require direct voter approval in Arkansas counties, a shift that hands more control to local communities while potentially complicating future developments.

      The Pope County casino controversy has been raging since 2018, when a bidding war resulted in Gulfside Casino Partnership initially winning. However, following legal challenges, Cherokee Nation Businesses eventually forced Gulfside out.

      That was only the beginning, not the end, of the battle. The legal challenges and ARC’s involvement continued, leading to this week’s final word on the matter by local residents.

      Lake of the Ozarks casino proposal off the table

      Missouri voters, too, voiced their opinions on gaming development. By a narrow 52%-48% vote, they turned down a measure that would have allowed the construction of a casino near the Bagnell Dam on the Osage River at Lake of the Ozarks.

      Amendment 5, backed by Bally’s Corporation and the Osage River Gaming and Convention Committee (OGCC), would have enabled the construction of a casino on artificial bodies of water. Proponents had hoped the amendment would bring new economic opportunities and jobs to the area, which is already a popular tourist destination.

      The amendment’s defeat brings a significant setback for Bally’s, which operates a Kansas City casino, and for the OGCC, which has been working toward this casino proposal for years. Efforts to secure a new casino license date back to 2009 when a fire destroyed the President riverboat casino, leaving an open opportunity for a new license. After attempts to push the measure through legislation in 2018 failed, the OGCC pursued a ballot initiative, only to face strong opposition from the Osage Nation.

      The Osage Nation has its own interests in the area, as it is actively developing a $60 million Class II gaming facility in nearby Miller County. As a tribal operation, this facility only requires federal, not state, approval. With Amendment 5 rejected, the Osage Nation now stands as the sole casino project near Lake of the Ozarks, giving the tribe an advantageous position in the region’s gaming market.

      Federal approval of this Class II venue, once finalized, would mark the tribe’s first Missouri casino, adding to its existing properties across Oklahoma.

      Get Weekly Email Updates

      Covering all aspects of regulated U.S. online casinos, iGaming, sweepstakes, and more

      Related Posts

      nj beach heart

      Shore Thing: July Another Near-$200-Million Month For Online Casino In New Jersey

      aqueduct racing

      Real Estate Mogul Weighs In On Chase For NYC-Area Casino Licenses

      Kalshi Users Create $198 Million In Contracts For First Two Rounds Of NCAA Tournament

      cease and desist

      Illinois Gaming Board Latest To Send Cease-And-Desist Letters To Kalshi, Robinhood, Crypto.com

      Recommended Read

      ohio statehouse

      News

      Ohio Introduces Online Casino Bill, Would Allow Up To 11 Apps

      There’s More…

      minnesota capitol

      News

      Minnesota Sports Betting Opponents Go On Offensive

      January 9, 2025

      Chris Altruda

      blumenthal tonko

      News

      SAFE Bet Act ‘Reintroduced’ At DC Press Conference, Addictive Nature Of Sports Betting Emphasized

      March 11, 2025

      Eric Raskin

      News

      New York Casino Licensing Bill Stalls as Deadline Nears, Leaving 2025 Timeline Intact

      September 9, 2024

      Erik Gibbs

      delta plane

      News

      Delta-DraftKings Partnership Won’t Exactly Bring Gambling To 30,000 Feet

      February 6, 2025

      Jeff Edelstein

      Get Weekly Email Updates

      Covering all aspects of regulated U.S. online casinos, iGaming, sweepstakes, and more

      • About
      • Contact
      • Privacy
      • Terms
      • Disclosure
      • Responsible Gaming

      © 2025 Casino Reports. Web Design by Fhoke.