• Industry
    • Opinion
    • Features
      • iGaming Data
      • Sports Betting Data
    • Finance
    • Online Casinos
    • Podcast

      Opinion

      Keith Whyte’s NCPG Exit Raises Questions About Future Of Responsible Gambling Movement

      Industry watchers wonder: Will NCPG’s moderate stance survive without its agnostic longtime leader at the wheel?

      By Jeff Edelstein

      Last updated: January 27, 2025

      3 min

      exit door

      With Keith Whyte — choose one — (fired), (forced out), (amicably split), (left happily), (quit angrily) from the National Council on Problem Gambling, a group he helmed for over a quarter-century (which, in the timeline of online gambling, equals forever), a fair question to ask right now is simply this: What happens next?

      Whyte wasn’t the singular moderate voice in the responsible gambling world, but he was more or less “the” moderate voice in the responsible gambling world, and while he posted on LinkedIn that he’ll continue to work in the space, he won’t have the NCPG brand behind him. And — perhaps even more importantly — the NCPG won’t have the Whyte brand behind them.

      “Keith is agnostic on gambling,” said longtime casino exec (and Casino Reports contributor) Richard Schuetz.

      And that’s about all you’re going to see by way of attributed quotes for the rest of this piece. I spoke with a bunch of people in the RG space, and no one wanted to go on record. Everyone’s a little jumpy right now.

      And nobody knows what’s going on.

      One question that kept coming up is the obvious: Why is Whyte out? It certainly seems he was forced out, based on the short press release from the NCPG that came out of nowhere.

      I have known Keith Whyte for about 40 years. I found the press release by the @NCPG concerning his leaving amateurish and poorly written. Anyone who wants to visit, jump into my DMs. I'm on a train to NYC and will be back home tonight.

      — Richard Schuetz (@Schuetzinc) January 17, 2025

      And most people I talked to had questions on the same theme: Who’s pulling the strings?

      “When it comes to problem gambling programs, you worry about the same thing you worry about with regulatory bodies: Who are they representing and have they been captured?” one watcher told me.

      Who’s running the show?

      On one hand, there were plenty of people on the “we need more stringent rules to protect Americans!” side who believed Whyte was too close to the gambling industry, and now the worry is the NCPG is going to push the industry away.

      On the other hand, there were plenty of people on the “let ‘er rip, we’re all adults here” side who accused Whyte of challenging the gambling industry too much, and as a result of his leaving, that may mean the industry has “infiltrated” the NCPG.

      But, as one person I spoke to pointed out, the answer is probably … both and neither.

      They said things like Whyte walked the fine line of putting science and evidence together with policy pushes that attempted to maximize collaboration, that he was seen as THE (not my caps) moderate and pragmatic person in the space. They pointed out that he never threw around words like “never” and “always.”

      That he was, as Schuetz said, agnostic.

      Which brings us back to the opening query: What happens next?

      As in, if the agnostic, moderate, pragmatic voice no longer has the pulpit at the NCPG, what happens to the RG space? What happens to the NCPG? 

      Spot on.

      To not give someone who spent 26 years at the helm a chance to say goodbye in the release is petty, even if it ended poorly (clearly not a planned departure).

      Keith's departure creates a credibility vacuum. The NCPG was Keith, and I fear the NCPG's fate is sealed. https://t.co/IwTK5SRhqA

      — Steve Ruddock (@SteveRuddock) January 17, 2025

      On one side, you have the fire-and-brimstone crew, led by former gambling addict Harry Levant, who is the director of gambling policy with the Public Health Advocacy Institute at Northeastern University and one of the architects of the SAFE Bet Act, a piece of federal legislation that would take the knees out of the current online gambling space. An almost identical piece of legislation was just introduced on a state level in Massachusetts.

      On the other side, you have — basically — the gambling industry. While they (obviously) paint a very public picture of being Very Concerned about responsible gambling, it doesn’t take a Ph.D. in psychology to recognize that without people going on tilt every now and again, there is no gambling industry. (Come on. We all know that’s true. Are we still doing “sorry not sorry”? If so, #SorryNotSorry.)

      For the last quarter-century, Whyte — as the NCPG — staked his claim in the middle of all this. 

      So many questions

      Does the middle hold without Whyte at the helm?

      Does the NCPG abandon the middle?

      As of today, we don’t know. And remember: All this happened mere weeks after the Congressional hearing on sports betting (in which Whyte and Levant were two of five witnesses called, and none were called from the industry itself).

      The questions just beget more questions.

      Was it Whyte’s position that needed to be changed?

      If so, is the NCPG about to change its position? 

      Will the NCPG carry any weight without Whyte?

      Will this create a vacuum in which one side or the other runs roughshod? Or will it create an environment — much like the current political climate — where everyone is dug in, yelling at each other, not willing to even hear the other side? 

      One person told me that “tensions seem to be mounting” between the problem gambling advocates and the industry, and that the only people who are going to lose in this scenario are the consumers.

      “There is only one Keith Whyte,” one watcher told me. “And it’s such a loss for NCPG and the entire field. A man that perfected how to play the game, yet never let the games play him or the issues he stood behind.”

      Get Weekly Email Updates

      Covering all aspects of regulated U.S. online casinos, iGaming, sweepstakes, and more

      Related Posts

      tyson paul

      Tyson vs. Paul Is A Sanctioned Sporting Event — But That Doesn’t Mean States Should Sanction Betting On It

      security cam

      Schuetz: Where Is Matthew Holt And Who Is Watching The Store?

      arm tattoo

      Schuetz: Tell Me Again Why I Need To Describe My Scars And Tattoos To Get A Gaming License?

      jontay porter

      NBA Player Prop Changes Are A Great Solution … In A World Without Offshores

      Recommended Read

      News

      Athlete Harassment, Prop Bets, Microbetting Among Topics Assessed At Senate Committee Hearing On Sports Gambling

      There’s More…

      tank keyboard

      Opinion

      Schuetz: Asymmetric Warfare And The Question Of Who Is Looking Out For The Bettors

      Asymmetry is introduced when the operators have huge budgets for lobbying, and the betting consumers have essentially nothing.

      June 25, 2024

      Richard Schuetz

      arm tattoo

      Opinion

      Schuetz: Tell Me Again Why I Need To Describe My Scars And Tattoos To Get A Gaming License?

      May 19, 2025

      Richard Schuetz

      tilt

      Opinion

      Gambling, Tilting, And Winning: We Need A Name For This

      March 12, 2025

      Jeff Edelstein

      Opinion

      Schuetz: Las Vegas Appears To Be Welcoming Back Organized Crime, Felons, Money Laundering, And California’s Bookies

      September 11, 2024

      Richard Schuetz

      Get Weekly Email Updates

      Covering all aspects of regulated U.S. online casinos, iGaming, sweepstakes, and more

      • About
      • Contact
      • Privacy
      • Terms
      • Disclosure
      • Responsible Gaming

      © 2025 Casino Reports. Web Design by Fhoke.